20. When fraud or corruption risks are raised at my organisation, my organisation takes proactive steps to reduce the risk.

Public Sector Fraud Awareness Survey - Findings: Fraud detection.

Observation:

Pie chart of Question 20: When fraud or corruption risks are raised at my organisation, my organisation takes proactive steps to reduce the risk.

86.6% of respondents say their organisation takes proactive steps to reduce fraud risk.

This view was shared by senior managers and staff alike and across all sectors.

What some respondents have said:

“Our CEO is proactive on these matters and he reminds staff about the need for staying alert to fraud and corruption issues regularly at staff meetings.”

“I believe the risks for this organisation are very low, we are a medium size business with a large number of transactions being processed through automated approval system with approved suppliers.”

PwC comment:
Although organisations should be able to trust their employees to do the right thing, having trusted employees is not a fraud control. Many instances of fraud have been committed by trusted employees. Organisations need to be able to verify that their staff are complying with policies and procedures, and include fraud risk management as a component of business-as-usual risk management.

“We run electronic detection software over accounts payable and payroll data on a regular basis searching for irregularities and fraud.”

“We do work on a high trust model. But I think there are enough checks in place through audit and the Finance person on the Board and Our school Manager and accounts person.”

“We have checks in place by separate staff in most areas where fraud could occur. We also are audited each year by Audit NZ. We have reduced the number of solo roles and have backup people to carry out everyone's jobs except for one position which we also intend to ensure that person does not hold all the intellectual information alone.”

  Yes No Don’t know Total Count
Chief Executive Officer/Managing Director/Principal 359 94% 1 0% 23 6% 383
Member of the senior executive/leadership team or equivalent 453 92% 4 1% 33 7% 490
Line manager (if not one of the above) 161 74% 3 1% 55 25% 219
Administration/Support Services 167 84% 1 1% 32 16% 200
Operational staff (e.g. Teacher, Analyst, Advisor, Technician, Officer, Engineer, Accountant) 96 71% 1 1% 39 29% 136
Other (please specify) 1,236 87% 10 1% 182 13% 1,428
  Yes No Don’t know Total Count
Central Government              
Autonomous Crown Entities 51 94% 0 0% 3 6% 54
Central Government - Other 45 100% 0 0% 0 0% 45
Crown Agents or Companies  84 97% 1 1% 2 2% 87
Crown Research Institutes 37 97% 0 0% 1 3% 38
District Health Boards 55 79% 1 1% 14 20% 70
Government Departments 134 92% 2 1% 9 6% 145
Independent Crown Entities 35 95% 0 0% 2 5% 37
Māori Trust Boards 10 91% 1 9% 0 0% 11
Rural Education Activities Programmes 11 100% 0 0% 0 0% 11
State-Owned Enterprises 46 98% 0 0% 1 2% 47
Tertiary Education Institutions 87 96% 0 0% 4 4% 91
Sub-Total 595 94% 5 1% 36 6% 636
  Yes No Don’t know Total Count
Local Government              
Airports 14 74% 0 0% 5 26% 19
Council Controlled Organisations or Council Controlled Trading Organisations 62 83% 1 1% 12 16% 75
Energy Companies 25 89% 0 0% 3 11% 28
Fish and Game Councils 8 100% 0 0% 0 0% 8
Licensing and Community Trusts 8 89% 0 0% 1 11% 9
Local Authorities 145 86% 3 2% 21 12% 169
Local Government - Other  9 82% 0 0% 2 18% 11
Port Companies 2 100% 0 0% 0 0% 2
Sub-Total 273 85% 4 1% 44 14% 321
               
Schools 422 90% 4 1% 44 9% 470
Total 1,236 87% 10 1% 182 13% 1,428
page top